Skip to main content
Print

Defense offers $45K (CCP 998) in rearender, but jury says that's too much. $10K. Los Angeles County.

Summary

Plaintiff claims disability after rearender, but defense says the impact was too low to cause the claimed injury.

The Case

  • Court and Case Number: Sonoma County Superior Court / SCV255868
  • Type of Case: Vehicles - Auto vs. Auto
  • Type of Result: Jury Verdict

The Attorneys

  • Attorney for the Plaintiff:

    Carpenter, Zuckerman & Rowley LLP by Martin J. Kanarek, Bevelry Hills.

  • Attorney for the Defendant:

    Phillip M Andersen & Associates by Jonathan H. Erb, Pleasanton.

Subscribe to Read the Full Verdict
Print

Disclaimer

This is not an official court document. While the publisher believes the information to be accurate, the publisher does not guarantee it and the reader is advised not to rely upon it without consulting the official court documents or the attorneys of record in this matter who are listed above.

Copyright © 2026 by Neubauer & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.

Subscribe Today
Access All the Case Details Behind Every Verdict

JuryVerdictAlert.com provides limited case details for public viewing so you can see the scope of our coverage. However, access to complete case summaries, full fact patterns, damages breakdowns, attorney and expert information, and advanced search features is reserved for subscribers.

To review the full version of each verdict in our database you’ll need an active subscription to JuryVerdictAlert.com.