Vehicles - Auto vs. Auto

To counter the defense argument as to extent of injury, plaintiff called the treating physician from Kaiser to testify that plaintiff was an active patient with no prior spine injuries/conditions. 

Car is totaled in heavy-impact collission, but defendant disputes injury extent and causation.

"Eggshell" plaintiff with congenital “Chiari malformation” suffers ongoing pain after rear-ender, and will require C-section to deliver a child.

Liability in question after collision at controlled intersection. Red light case.

Defendant admitted liability but disputed the claims of neck injury.  Refused $100K policy limits demand.

Plaintiff applies the vehicle-use exception to "coming and going" rule in course-and-scope-of-employment claim. Beats 998.

Causation and extent of injury disputed when surgery takes place three years after collision.

Plaintiffs seek diminished value claim on leased vehicle after sideswipe damage to Audi.

Plaintiff handily beats CCP 998 demand.

Plaintiff t-bones defendant as he is attempting to cross multiple lanes of traffic.  He says she was speeding.

Foreign tourist in San Francisco runs red light.

Pre-existing medical conditions become the focus of defense.

Defendant claims excessive medical care and pre-existing conditions.

Liability is accepted but causation is disputed owing to plaintiff's prior injury accidents.