LA public bus stops in middle of street instead of at curb for exiting passenger. $5.7M. Los Angeles County.
Summary
Passenger exits the rear door of the bus and steps into traffic in the curb-side lane. Serious leg injuries; future surgical care disputed.
The Case
- Case Name: Kevin McElrath v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, et al.
- Court and Case Number: Los Angeles Superior Court / 21STCV33539
- Date of Verdict or Judgment: Thursday, January 30, 2025
- Date Action was Filed: Friday, September 10, 2021
- Type of Case: Bus and Streetcar Passenger Accidents, Vehicles - vs. Pedestrian
- Judge or Arbitrator(s): Hon. Ian C. Fusselman
-
Plaintiffs: Kevin McElrath
-
Defendants: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityRobert Albertazzi (bus driver)
- Type of Result: Jury Verdict
The Result
- Gross Verdict or Award: $5,771,068.50
-
Award as to each Defendant:
100% against Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority and bus driver Robert Albertazzi.
- Contributory/Comparative Negligence: 0% against plaintiff and 0% against non-defendant driver.
-
Economic Damages:
Past medical costs: $458,094.50
Future medical costs: $1,062,974
-
Non-Economic Damages:
Past pain and suffering: $1,750,000
Future pain and suffering: $2,500,000
- Trial or Arbitration Time: 7 days
- Jury Deliberation Time: 1 1/2 days
- Jury Polls: 12-0 defendants’ negligence, 12-0; economic damages, 11-1; past non-economic damages, 10-2; future non-economic damages, 10-2; plaintiff’s contributory negligence, 12-0; other party negligence.
- Post Trial Motions & Post-Verdict Settlements: Judgment has been satisfied.
The Attorneys
-
Attorney for the Plaintiff:
Omega Law Group, PC by Lourdes DeArmas and Ashley Laiken, Beverly Hills.
-
Attorney for the Defendant:
Law Offices of O’Reilly & McDermott by Paul O’Reilly, Torrance.
The Experts
-
Plaintiff's Medical Expert(s):
Eric S. Millstein, M.D., orthopedic surgery.
Babak Samimi, M.D., orthopedic surgery. (Treating Physician.)
Gary Chen, M.D., orthopedic surgery. (Treating Physician.)
Carol Brooks, DDS, dental. (Treating Physician.)
Erica Brenner, PT. (Treating physical therapist.)
-
Defendant's Medical Expert(s):
Arthur Kreitenberg, M.D., orthopedic surgery.
-
Plaintiff's Technical Expert(s):
J. Robert Berkstresser, commercial bus safety.
Andrew S. Morris, D.C., medical billing.
-
Defendant's Technical Expert(s):
Paul Adams, medical billing.
Facts and Background
-
Facts and Background:
On August 9, 2020, at approximately 7:25 p.m., plaintiff was a passenger on Metro Bus No. 111, operated by defendant driver in the course of his employment with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA). Upon requesting to exit the bus, plaintiff expected it to stop at the curb, consistent with LACMTA protocol and his prior experience. Instead, defendant driver opened the rear doors while the bus was stopped in the middle of Florence Avenue – a full lane away from the curb – without providing any warning to plaintiff or other passengers. As plaintiff stepped off the bus, he was immediately struck by a passing vehicle, sustaining significant injuries including a shattered knee, fractured ankle, and broken teeth.
-
Plaintiff's Contentions:
Plaintiff contended that both LACMTA and defendant driver Albertazzi , as common carriers, owed plaintiff the highest duty of care, and that multiple failures directly led to the incident.
Commercial bus operations expert Robert Berkstresser testified that Albertazzi violated four key LACMTA safety protocols: 1. Failure to pull the bus within 6–18 inches of the curb; 2. Failure to check mirrors for passenger safety before opening the doors; 3. Failure to warn passengers of hazards before allowing them to exit; and 4. Failure to pull the bus to the curb when a passenger requested to exit outside of a designated stop.
Plaintiff further emphasized that LACMTA’s own policies, corroborated by its Person Most Knowledgeable, Shonda Breland, clearly require drivers to stop at the curb to ensure passenger safety. No evidence was presented that any hazard or obstruction prevented Albertazzi from doing so. The vehicle that struck McElrath was not a party to the case.
Defendants had claimed the incident was a hit-and-run, but video surveillance footage showed otherwise – the driver of the vehicle stopped, exited the car, and walked over to plaintiff after the impact.
Plaintiff presented evidence that he required multiple surgeries and extensive rehabilitation and will need future medical care, including a total knee replacement. Medical and billing experts testified that his total damages, including future treatment, exceeded $1 million. At trial, plaintiff requested that the jury award $8,603,668 in total damages, including compensation for past and future medical expenses, as well as past and future pain and suffering.
-
Defendant's Contentions:
Defendants LACMTA and Robert Albertazzi denied negligence and argued that plaintiff was solely responsible for the incident. They contended that plaintiff failed to observe his surroundings and voluntarily stepped into an active lane of traffic after exiting the bus. The defense maintained that the bus was lawfully stopped and that Albertazzi’s conduct met the applicable standard of care. LACMTA further emphasized that the vehicle that struck plaintiff fled the scene and was never identified, characterizing the incident as a hit-and-run.
The defendants argued that they should not be held liable for the unforeseeable criminal conduct of a third-party driver who was not part of the trial.
On damages, the defense did not dispute that plaintiff sustained injuries, but strongly challenged the scope of future treatment and costs. Their medical expert, Dr. Kreitenberg, opined that while plaintiff had experienced a difficult recovery, he would not require a knee replacement or future surgeries, and that his condition could be managed with over-the-counter medication and stretching. Defense billing expert Mr. Adams further argued that the reasonable value of plaintiff’s past medical care was only $103,000, and future care would not exceed $13,000 – a sharp contrast to plaintiff’s estimate exceeding $1 million.
At trial, LACMTA urged the jury to award no more than $380,000 – and only if liability were found – in total damages, including compensation for past and future medical expenses, as well as past and future pain and suffering.
Injuries and Other Damages
-
Physical Injuries claimed by Plaintiff:
Plaintiff, who was 27 years old and had no prior medical history, suffered serious injuries upon impact. He was transported by ambulance to California Hospital Medical Center in Torrance with significant injuries to the right side of his leg and face. At the emergency room, plaintiff presented with pain in his right knee and ankle, bleeding from his right ear, and chipped upper right incisors. A medical examination by orthopedic surgeon Gary Chen, M.D. revealed extensive lower extremity trauma, including a comminuted and depressed fracture of the right tibial plateau, a right fibular head fracture, a hematoma in the right knee, a torn lateral meniscus, swelling in the knee and ankle, abrasions to the left foot and ankle, a right fibular shaft fracture, an avulsion fracture of the lateral tibial plafond, and a syndesmotic injury with separation of the right ankle tibiofibular joint.
Dr. Chen performed emergency surgery, which included an open arthrotomy with hematoma evacuation, open reduction and internal fixation of the tibial plateau fracture, and repair of the lateral meniscus. Additionally, he performed open reduction and internal fixation of the right ankle’s lateral malleolus fracture and syndesmosis injury.
Plaintiff was discharged after four days with a long leg splint for joint protection. For his dental injuries, Carol Brooks, DDS diagnosed fractures to the central and lateral incisors with exposed nerves. She performed root canal therapy, followed by post and crown placements to restore the damaged teeth.
Despite extensive physical therapy and conservative treatment, plaintiff required multiple additional surgeries on his right knee and ankle. In February 2023, Babak Samimi, M.D. performed a meniscus repair and removed loose hardware, including large screws used to stabilize the knee from the initial surgery to alleviate pain and inflammation caused by fraying cartilage. In July 2023, Dr. Samimi performed an arthroscopy of the right ankle hardware removal, including the extraction of a broken and painful screw. In February 2024, Dr. Samimi performed a right distal femur opening wedge osteotomy to realign the leg and redistribute weight, and alleviate post-traumatic arthritis.
Plaintiff also underwent pain management injections for ongoing knee and ankle discomfort. However, despite these efforts, it was acknowledged that he would never walk the same again. The goal of these procedures was to provide the best possible function and delay the need for an eventual total knee replacement. Despite agreeing with the necessity of plaintiff’s previous surgeries and physical therapy, the defense’s orthopedic surgery expert, Dr. Arthur Kreitenberg, disagreed with the projections regarding his future medical care. Dr. Kreitenberg acknowledged that plaintiff had undergone necessary treatments, but he rejected the need for future knee replacement surgeries.
Dr. Samimi, Dr. Chen, and Dr. Millstein, however, all testified that plaintiff would eventually require a total knee replacement, followed by additional replacements approximately every 15 years thereafter. Given plaintiff's young age, they emphasized the need for ongoing measures to alleviate his pain until then. These measures include further screw removals, continued physical therapy to maintain range of motion, and chronic pain management through injections. Additionally, both Dr. Millstein and Dr. Samimi anticipated that plaintiff would need another ankle surgery in the future.
Special Damages
- Special Damages Claimed - Past Medical: $458,094.50
- Special Damages Claimed - Future Medical: $1,145,574.00
Additional Notes
Plaintiff demanded $4 million during mediation. At the final status conference, defense counsel offered $2 million and plaintiff countered at $3 million. Before voir dire, defense counsel went up to $2.5 million while plaintiff continued to counter with $3 million.