A 15-year-old boy playing cops and robbers on his bicycle with friends in Palmdale was shot by a sheriff's deputy after he allegedly pointed the toy gun at two officers.
- Case Name: William Fetters v. County of Los Angeles and Deputy Scott Sorrow
- Court and Case Number: Los Angeles Superior Court/ BC 437875
- Date of Verdict or Judgment: Wednesday, March 27, 2013
- Date Action was Filed: Monday, May 17, 2010
- Type of Case: Civil Rights, Police Shooting
- Judge or Arbitrator(s): Hon. Ernest Hiroshige
Plaintiffs: William Fetters, 15
Defendants: Deputy Scott Sorrow
- Type of Result: Jury Verdict
- Gross Verdict or Award: $1,127,600 + fees and costs
- Net Verdict or Award: $1,127,600
Award as to each Defendant:
$1.127 million against LA County. In addition plaintiff will seek attorneys fees and litigation costs.
- Contributory/Comparative Negligence: None.
$2,600 in medical bills. The jury awarded the maximum allowed.
Jury was hung on this; will have a new trial.
- Trial or Arbitration Time: 23 days
- Jury Deliberation Time: 7 days
- Jury Polls: 9-3 liability; 11-1 damages
- Post Trial Motions & Post-Verdict Settlements: Defendant anticipates post-trial motions and an appeal. Per plaintiff's counsel, defendants refused to settle. Per defense counsel, there have been no post-verdict settlement discussions.
Attorney for the Plaintiff: Goldberg & Gage by Bradley Gage, Woodland Hills.
Law Offices of Robert R. Shiri, APC by Robert Shiri, Santa Monica.
Attorney for the Defendant:
Collins Collins Muir + Stewart LLP by Catie Mathers and Nicole Davis Tinkham, South Pasadena.
Plaintiff’s Medical Expert(s):
Defendant's Medical Expert(s):
Catherine Scarf, Ph.D., clinical psychology, Los Angeles
Bradley Roth, M.D., sugery, Los Angeles
Plaintiff's Technical Expert(s):
Otis Dobine, former LAPD officer (use of force).
Defendant's Technical Expert(s):
Gil Juarado, retired LASD commander (use of force).
Sgt. Paul Delhauer, LASD (crime scene reconstruction).
Facts and Background
Facts and Background:
On May 10, 2009 plaintiff, then a 15-year-old male high school student, was playing a game of "cops and robbers" with his friends on bicycles in Palmdale. He was holding a realistic looking toy gun as officers approached. The deputies claimed they saw the gun, felt it was putting individuals in danger and investigated. They claimed that when they told the boy to stop, he turned suddenly and pointed the gun at the deputies. Defendant deputy then shot plaintiff one time. His injuries were minimal.
The plaintiff was criminally prosecuted with three charges of brandishing a weapon.
That plaintiff listened to the deputies' commands and did not threaten them. The plaintiff claimed that when the deputies came up to him, he dropped the gun as instructed and then he was shot.
That when deputies told the boy to stop, he turned suddenly and pointed the gun at the deputies who were in fear for their lives.
Defendants were not allowed to present evidence regarding plaintiff’s admissions and criminal prosecution to the jury.
Injuries and Other Damages
Physical Injuries claimed by Plaintiff:
Removal of a bullet lodged near the skin. Admitted medical bills totaled $2,760.
Emotional distress, pain and suffering.
- Special Damages Claimed - Past Medical: $2,760
Demands and Offers
- Plaintiff §998 Demand: $49,999